Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/25/2002 04:30 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 305-NONCOMPLIANCE WITH SELECTIVE SERVICE
COLLEEN SHAUB, Aide to Representative Lisa Murkowski, sponsor of
HB 305, said the intent of this legislation is to ensure that all
Alaskans are knowledgeable about the Selective Service
registration system and would register promptly. She said HB 305
would require any U.S. male citizen between the ages of 18-26 to
comply with the federal Selective Service registration if
applicable to be eligible for certain state employment, an Alaska
Student Loan (ASL) or the Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD). She
said at least 28 other states had implemented similar conditions
for eligibility for certain programs and state benefits. Federal
law already requires registration with the Selective Service
within 30 days of turning 18. At the federal level, a person who
does not register will be denied certain federal employment and
aid. She said HB 305 brings those aspects down to the state
level and adds the provision on the PFD. She said the sponsor
would like the committee to adopt the following amendment:
Page 4, following line 8:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 3. AS 14.43.172(c) is amended to read:
(c) In addition to the provisions of (a) of this
section, a borrower is eligible for a loan under
AS 14.43.170 - 14.43.175 if the borrower
(1) is not delinquent on and has never been in
default on a loan previously awarded by the commission;
(2) at the time of application or loan
disbursement does not have a past due child support
obligation established by court order or by the child
support enforcement division under AS 25.27.160 - 25.27.220;
(3) has not, within the previous five years, had
a loan discharged or written off by the commission for any
reason;
(4) does not have a status, at the time of
application for a loan or disbursement of loan money, that
would prevent the borrower from repaying the loan as it
becomes due;
(5) has not within the previous five years
defaulted on another loan made to the borrower by a lending
entity unless the borrower can show good faith efforts to
repay the loan and extraordinary circumstances that led to
the default; [AND]
(6) does not have a credit history, at the time
of application for a loan, that demonstrates chronic
inability or unwillingness to pay an extension of credit or
loan as it becomes due; and
(7) has complied with the military selective
service registration requirements imposed under 50 U.S.C
App. 453 (Military Selective Service Act), if those
requirements were applicable to the person, or the person
has come into compliance within 30 days of being notified of
the person's lack of compliance."
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
Page 6, line 12:
Delete "a student"
Insert "an education loan, supplemental education loan,"
SENATOR PHILLIPS asked where the sponsor was.
MS. SHAUB said Representative Murkowski was in the fiscal
discussion meeting.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked if she had concluded her remarks. He
also asked if there was any obligation under federal law for the
State to try and compel Selective Service registration. He said
usually when a short title was put in, it was a section of the
statutes. But the language in HB 305 appears scattered
throughout the statutes and it has a title. He asked why this
was done.
MS. SHAUB said the sponsor wanted the title to seem less
abrasive.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT said the title would be in the uncodified
section of the statutes whereas the operative language would be
spread throughout the statutes. He used the example of a new
crime being added to the statutes where the title would appear in
the regular statute along with the new crime language. He noted
that with HB 305, they wouldn't even be in the same book. He
said this seemed strange to him.
DIANE BARRANS, Director of the Alaska Commission on Postsecondary
Education (ACPE), said HB 305 did not reference the new student
loan programs that would go into effect July 2002 but were not
yet in statute. The amendment in the bill packet references the
new AS 14.43.172 that contains the new Alaska Supplemental
Education Loan Program. The requirement for Selective Service
registration would be added to the requirements for the loan.
The amendment ensures that the changes the sponsor wanted to make
to the ASL program were carried through to the new loan as well.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked how someone would prove that he had
complied with Selective Service registration when he applied for
the ASL.
MS. BARRANS said ACPE proposed to verify registration in a way
that would cause no additional cost to ACPE. ACPE would require
prospective borrowers to fill out the Free Application for
Federal Student Aid, which they would need to do anyway to be
eligible for the new Alaska Supplemental Loan Program. The U.S.
Department of Education would then send the application through a
data review, performing matches against the Immigration Service,
the Selective Service, the Internal Revenue Service and other
such agencies, to ensure that the borrower was eligible for their
loan. ACPE would take eligibility for the federal loan as an
assurance that the borrower met the Selective Service
requirement.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked if the borrower would be required to
fill out this form every year.
MS. BARRANS said the borrower would have to fill out a renewal
form that would have the data from the prior year and they would
simply have to update changes to that information.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT pointed out the exemptions listed in Sec. 4
of HB 305 and asked why these employees would be exempt.
MS. SHAUB said she believed these employees were already exempt
under federal law.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT said a legislator could take college courses
and get a student loan. He asked why they would be exempt.
MS. BARRANS said Sec. 4 makes it a requirement to register for
Selective Service in order to be employed in certain job classes.
SENATOR STEVENS said it was federal law that being elected to a
position, exempted a person from a lot of requirements. He said
that if a person had been convicted of a felony, they would not
be eligible to be hired for or appointed to certain positions.
However, they could be elected to that position.
SENATOR HALFORD pointed out that the mayor of Washington, D.C.,
Marion Berry, had been convicted of cocaine possession.
LANCE HERRINGTON said he was on the teleconference in the event
that Charlie Smith was not available.
SENATOR PHILLIPS said the question of Selective Service had been
on his questionnaire and he received a lot of comments asking why
females weren't required to register for Selective Service. He
said he knew that this was federal law but wondered if there was
a push to include females.
MR. HERRINGTON said he was not employed by the Selective Service
so he didn't know what they were or were not doing. He didn't
believe that they were under any pressure to register females at
this time.
NANCI JONES, Director of the Permanent Fund Dividend Division,
noted the language on page 6, lines 2-8, "come into compliance
within 30 days of being notified of their lack of compliance."
This would establish a different time frame for PFD applicants
who didn't comply with Selective Service registration versus
everybody else that applied for the PFD. She said this would be
difficult to administer. She noted the Division already had an
agreement with the Selective Service. The Division would send
Selective Service a tape of people who would be eligible for the
requirement and the Selective Service would send that tape back
with a list of people who had registered. The Division would
match the tape against a list of PFD applicants. If a person had
not registered for Selective Service, the Division would send
them a notice. That notice would be the same notice that
everybody else who has an incomplete application receives
establishing a time frame to get additional information to the
Division. The applicant would have until the given date to
register with Selective Service. The Division would get another
tape from Selective Service to verify that the applicant had
registered.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked if the applicant could send a photocopy
of their registration or if they had to wait for the information
to get in the system.
MS. JONES said the applicant would have to wait. In the first
year of the Selective Service requirement, the Division
would ask Selective Service to send two tapes at two
different times of the year. The effective date of HB 305
is January 1, 2004, so the first tape would include
everybody who had registered with Selective Service from
January 1 through December 31, 2003. She said that tape
would be matched against the applications for the 2004 PFD.
A notice would be sent to the applicants that were out of
compliance saying that they needed to register with
Selective Service before October 31. Another tape would be
received from Selective Service, which would be run just
before payment, probably in August. She said if the
applicant was not on that tape, then they would be denied
their PFD along with everybody else who did not respond to
the Division's correspondence. For the second year, 2005,
the Division would already have the tape from August. The
Division would receive a tape each year in August. She is
concerned that the 30-day provision would give the applicant
a false sense that something could get turned around that
quickly. The applicant has ten months to comply with
whatever they are lacking on their application. She said
there is always the opportunity to appeal a denial or extend
the length of time you have to comply with a request if you
work with the Division.
SENATOR HALFORD asked if the Selective Service tape could include
location.
MS. JONES said the Division wouldn't necessarily need that
information. They would only be interested in whether a person
had registered or not.
SENATOR HALFORD said that could be an important residency
crosscheck. He said sometimes people register where they are,
not where they came from. He noted that during the Vietnam War,
people would register in more populated areas because they felt
the draft board wouldn't get further down the numbers.
MS. JONES said at some point the Division could use the Selective
Service for residency but she guessed that if a person didn't
register with an Alaska address, they wouldn't be on the tape.
SENATOR HALFORD said you registered for Selective Service in a
certain geographical location. He thought it would be a good
idea to put that into the Division's database. When somebody
registers in a location that's not in Alaska, there's an
indication that they ought to be checked for residency unless
they're in active duty by the time the Division gets the
application.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked how the Division would catch up with
somebody who lived in Florida and moved to Alaska after they
turned 18. He asked if the Selective Service was going to run a
tape against the entire nation.
MS. JONES said Selective Service would just run a tape for the
people who are registered in Alaska.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked about someone who lived in Alaska but
registered in Florida when they turned 18.
MS. JONES said that would be up to the applicant. When the
Division sends them a letter saying they're not in compliance,
they would give the Division that information. The Division
would then verify those few with Selective Service. She said the
men between 18 and 25 would be matched against the tape Selective
Service gives the Division, so if an applicant is between those
ages and is not on the tape, they would receive a letter. She
noted that if any of the identifying information was wrong, such
as the Social Security Number, the Division wouldn't be able to
make a match and they would receive a letter. The applicant
could then say that they had registered and provide the Division
with proof.
SENATOR HALFORD said if the Division was only going to get the
match from Alaska, the system would do what he wanted it to do
because the applicant who didn't register in Alaska wouldn't get
a match and the Division would ask them to prove that they had
registered for the Selective Service. The applicant would then
say that they had registered somewhere else. He said that would
at least raise a flag that that person ought to be checked for
residency. He would like it to be one more piece of the
residency package that is in the system.
MS. SHAUB noted the requirement also wouldn't apply to someone
who wasn't in the 18-26 age range. Those applicants would still
get their PFD.
SENATOR HALFORD agreed that it only applied when you were
required to register with Selective Service.
MS. SHAUB said once someone turned 26, if they had never
registered with the Selective Service, they would still be able
to get their PFD.
SENATOR DAVIS moved Amendment #1 adding the Selective Service
requirement to the new student loan program.
The being no objection, Amendment #1 was adopted.
CHARLIE SMITH, State Director of the Selective Service in Alaska,
said his position was an uncompensated volunteer federal
position. He has been in the position for about six years. He
said he was available to answer any questions the committee might
have specific to the Selective Service.
TAPE 02-25, SIDE B
5:30 p.m.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked if the Permanent Fund Dividend Division
would be sending information to Mr. Smith to try to contact the
individuals who didn't register with Selective Service.
MR. SMITH said that would be done through the national computer
center. He said he is mainly involved with selecting people to
be on the draft board. He said there still is a draft board even
though there hasn't been a draft since 1973. He also has five
National Guard Reserve Forces Officers assigned to him. They
have offices in Juneau, Anchorage, Nome and Fairbanks and if the
draft ever gets reactivated, those offices would be reactivated.
He said Alaska has almost a 90% compliance rate with the
Selective Service. He said not too many people objected to being
on the list. He noted that it was just a list. If the draft
should come in, there would be other protections. The President
and the Congress would have to declare a draft. He has found
that the majority of people that do not register are not aware
that there's a requirement to register. He said they've tried
newspapers. He said he has a person working with him in every
high school in Alaska, usually a counselor, to help by letting
the young men know that there's a requirement. However, 10-15%
of these people still slip through the cracks.
He said other states have done this through the drivers'
licensing system. If a person doesn't register for the Selective
Service, they wouldn't be able to receive a drivers' license.
From his work as a deputy director and director of motor
vehicles, he knows that there are a lot of people who don't get
drivers' licenses. He hopes HB 305 would be a better vehicle to
promote registration.
SENATOR PHILLIPS asked Mr. Smith to refresh his memory as to why
females weren't included in the draft.
MR. SMITH said it was federal law. He said about 10 years ago
there was an ERA movement to get females included, but it died
off.
SENATOR PHILLIPS said he had a lot of comments on his
questionnaire that this was not fair. He even had one
constituent send him a letter requesting Stevens, Murkowski and
Young to introduce legislation to get females included. He
followed through on that. He thinks they out to be included.
MR. SMITH said his job is to get things that comply with the
current federal law going.
SENATOR PHILLIPS asked if we were making a request of Murkowski,
Young and Stevens to draft women.
MR. SMITH said he hadn't thought about it.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked if Representative Lisa Murkowski, the
sponsor, would have a problem with deleting Sec. 1 of HB 305,
which was the title. He said titles usually appear with the
language in the statute and this title would be in the uncodified
law with no language to accompany it. He doesn't see the need to
have the title in the uncodified law when there's nothing there
with it. He asked if other members of the committee shared his
concern.
SENATOR PHILLIPS moved Amendment #2.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT clarified that Amendment #2 would delete Sec.
1.
There being no objection Amendment #2 was adopted.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT said he thought he understood what the
sponsor was trying to do in giving the readers of HB 305
something to look at other than the legislative title. But since
this was close to being put in law, he didn't see the need for
it.
MS. BARRANS referenced the language in HB 305 on page 4, lines 7-
8 and in Amendment #1 on page 2, lines 1-2, stating, "or the
person has come into compliance within 30 days of being notified
of the person's lack of compliance." She said this would
actually reduce a person's opportunity to receive a student loan
and be considered eligible. She said if an applicant is denied
they can reapply at any time during school enrollment. She was
concerned that this language seems to limit that opportunity to
the 30 days following the denial. She requests that language be
struck from both the bill and the amendment. She also noted that
the effective date had been changed from a prior version of HB
305 to January 1, 2004. With respect to the education loan
sections, HB 305 would come into effect in the middle of a loan
year. She said this would be a problem because some borrowers
would have been approved without the requirement earlier in the
loan year and others would be required to register with Selective
Service during the second half of the same loan period.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked if there was a problem with the 30-day
provision to come into compliance with Selective Service
registration.
MS. SHAUB said she believed this was amended on the House floor.
She believed the Representatives had not realized that you could
reapply or appeal with both the PFD and the ASL. She believes it
would be fine to remove that language.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked if they just added that specific
language.
MS. SHAUB said they had. She said it was done so that if someone
didn't realize that they had to register with Selective Service
when they filled out their application and be denied as a result,
they weren't unduly punished. She said they could always go back
and reapply or appeal for the PFD or the ASL.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT said he'd like to work with the drafters and
Representative Murkowski to make sure that in incorporating the
amendments and dropping the 30-day provision they didn't create
other problems. He said the bill would come back before the
committee for final action.
HB 305 was held in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|